JUST IN: CIA Insider Unloads, Deep State “Terrified” Of Trump’s Orders, Want Him “Taken Out” With Plan
Well, NO. He is OUR President and we will protect him!
Jan 19, 2018Source: Conservative Daily Post | By Danny Abarno
Kevin Shipp is a former top agent at the CIA and is glad to see the president fighting back against his former agency. He says that the intelligence agencies act as a shadow government, who do as they please when they please it. President’s Trumps attack on human rights abuse and corruption was aimed directly at the deep state.
The days of the Presidency of Donald J. Trump are proving to be just as exciting as his incredibly famous, and now historical, race to the White House. While liberals, progressives, Marxists, and crybabies continue to cry foul that Russia helped elect Donald Trump, the rest of the country is awaiting more positive news about interference with the election. Now a former top CIA agent has brokenhis silence and has come forward to say that President Trump is terrifying the deep state and shadow government so much that they want the president “taken out!”
Ex-CIA officer Kevin Shipp seems glad to have a person like President Donald Trump at the reigns of the country because he is doing exactly what he said he would do, fight the deep state. The deep state is comprised of hundreds, if not thousands, of government agents, politicians, bureaucrats, and financiers who all have an interest in manipulating the political atmosphere of the United States. These various groups control both major political establishments through intimidation, blackmail, and deceit, but President Trump offers something other than the corrupt system.
This is why so many hate the man and refuse to give him a chance. Shipp goes on to say that this should be clear given the unending attacks from the media, who have been ordered by their editors to do anything they can to attack Trump. Never in the history of the United States has an election been so contested and resisted, and yet all of a sudden it is for President Trump? He represents the hand grenade being thrown into a broken system in order to produce good from chaos and that is exactly why so many fight against him so incredibly hard.
It has become clear to many that those in power do not want Donald Trump around because of the disruption he is making in the political world. What did Senator Chuck Schumer mean when he said the Intelligence agencies have ways at getting back at President Trump?
Shipp also wanted to make it clear that the intelligence agencies that make up what he calls the “shadow government” are not pleased with President Trump either. Many suspect that President Trump is soon going to expose the heinous crimes that many have been reporting on for years and that is why there is so much resistance from the elitists in charge. They do not want their skeletons out of their closets. However, Shipp is optimistic that Trump is the man to do this.
The CIA agent offered President Trump’s latest Executive Order as a good example of the president fighting back. The EO on Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption is a prime way to attack the monster that has become globalism as it treats human rights abuses and corruption as national threats. This allows the military to get involved in attacking and dismantling so many of the criminal networks that are continuing to create strife and misery in the world.
The organizations that are responsible for much of the pain and suffering in the world are part of the operation that despise President Trump so incredibly much. They run the drugs, smuggle the human slaves, produce child pornography, traffic stolen organs, anything one can think of as lucrative and illegal, the deep state and shadow governments have a hand in it. That is why it was so incredibly important for President Trump to sign the EO as it shows that he is committed to not only ending these practices, but holding those responsible accountable.
Shipp did seem quite worried that these coup like operations would eventually reach a point where Donald Trump had to be killed. He fears that this runs just as deep as the plot to eliminate President Kennedy and fears that operations are already underway to try to get President Trump to back down. However, Shipp remains confident that those surrounding the President are the best in the business.
In fact, many conservatives believe that the establishment is fighting so hard to destroy President Trump simply because his wealth has made him impossible to touch. Other senators and congress members immediately change their tune and goosestep right along with the establishment once in office, but President Trump has not.
Not only does the president have his personal Secret Service agents that are sworn to protect the president, President Trump has also brought in his own personal security forces. Not much is truly known about these heroes who protect the president, and frankly I do not want to know about these men and women. Their experiences, skills, or identities do not need to be public knowledge, as it will only be used to try and either attack them or attack the president.
Although indictments are finally starting to see the light of day, those who vehemently oppose President Trump are still free to do so and remain untouched. Those who work to undermine the president’s work will face the wrath of Trump and will ultimately be held accountable for the crimes that they have committed. If Kevin Shipp is right and President Trump is truly going after the drug, organ, and child traffickers then it is no wonder why the most wealthy and powerful oppose him.
These three, Mueller, Comey, and Obama, could not help but laugh as they controlled the world from the string they kept in their pocket. Now that President Trump offers to shed a light on the corruption as an outsider, they are doing everything in their power to destroy Trump before he can destroy them.
His presidency not only threatens their stability, it threatens the very reality they reside in as they will in fact face judgement for their actions, however atrocious they might be.
Watch the Interview below as Shipp explains how and why the deep state is so opposed to Trump.
|Memorandum of Law — Due Course of the Law of the LandPosted: 20 Jan 2018 10:13 PM PST|
Submitted to Operation Disclosure | By SephanYahMEMORANDUM OF LAWDUE COURSE OF THE LAW OF THE LANDIntroduction
I. Supreme, Absolute, and Uncontrollable Power in these United States.
It has been said that the Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land, yet, there is a far more superior power than both Federal and State constitutions. One that is manifest in the book of Genesis. One granted by our creator.
Mr. James Wilson, delegate to the constitutional convention, signor of the bill of rights, framer of the constitution, Brigadier General of the Pennsylvania State Militia, and later supreme court justice appointed by George Washington. He so eloquently describes the nature of power in these United States.
“There necessarily exists, in every government, a power from which there is no appeal, and which, for that reason, may be termed supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable. Where does this power reside?”
“Perhaps some politician, who has not considered with sufficient accuracy our political systems, would answer that, in our governments, the supreme power was vested in the constitutions. This opinion approaches a step nearer to the truth, but does not reach it. The truth is, that, in our governments, the supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable power remains in the people. As our constitutions are superior to our legislatures, so the people are superior to our constitutions. Indeed, the superiority, in this last instance, is much greater; for the people possess over our constitutions control in act, as well as right.”
“The consequence is, that the people may change the constitutions whenever and however they please. This is a right of which no positive institution can ever deprive them.”
“Oft have I marked, with silent pleasure and admiration, the force and prevalence, through the United States, of the principle that the supreme power resides in the people, and that they never part with it. It may be called the panacea in politics.” James Wilson; The Debates In The Convention Of The State Of Pennsylvania, On The Adoption Of The Federal Constitution. November 21, 1787.
“This will be a proper time for making an observation or two on what may be called the preamble to this Constitution. I had occasion, on a former day, to mention that the leading principle in the politics, and that which pervades the American constitutions, is, that the supreme power resides in the people. This Constitution, Mr. President, opens with a solemn and practical recognition of that principle: — “We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, &c., do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” It is announced in their name — it receives its political existence from their authority: they ordain and establish. What is the necessary consequence? Those who ordain and establish have the power, if they think proper, to repeal and annul.”
“…It renders this truth evident — that the people have a right to do what they please with regard to the government.” James Wilson; The Debates In The Convention Of The State Of Pennsylvania, On The Adoption Of The Federal Constitution. November 28, 1787.
“I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves: and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion.” Thomas Jefferson, Letter, September 28, 1820.
All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient. Constitution of the State of Texas, Article 1 Section 2, 1876
“The rights of the individual are not derived from government, or even from the Constitution. They exist inherently in every man by endowment of the Creator, and are merely reaffirmed in the Constitution * * * The Constitution but states again these rights already existing, and when legislative encroachment by the nation, state, or municipality invade these original and permanent rights, it is the duty of the courts to so declare, and to afford the necessary relief.” City of Dallas v. Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944, 945-46 (Tex. Civ. App., 1922).
II. Sovereignty in these United States.
Constitutions limit and define those original powers lent by the sovereignty, the people, to the different departments of government. No individual department or combination of departments may expand their authority or power thereby, taking from the people that which was not granted. We the people, wrote down with certain determination the powers we do grant. Sovereignty resides with the people.
“But, in this Constitution, the citizens of the United States appear dispensing a part of their original power in what manner and what proportion they think fit. They never part with the whole; and they retain the right of recalling what they part with.” James Wilson; The Debates In The Convention Of The State Of Pennsylvania, On The Adoption Of The Federal Constitution. November 28, 1787.
“…that the sovereignty resides in the people; they have not parted with it; they have only dispensed such portions of power as were conceived necessary for the public welfare. This Constitution stands upon this broad principle.”
“In order to recognize this leading principle, the proposed system sets out with a declaration that its existence depends upon the supreme authority of the people alone.” James Wilson; The Debates In The Convention Of The State Of Pennsylvania, On The Adoption Of The Federal Constitution. December 1, 1787.
“I now endeavor to show that the true and only safe principle for a free people, is a practical recognition of their original and supreme authority.”
“My general position is, that the absolute sovereignty never goes from the people.” James Wilson; The Debates In The Convention Of The State Of Pennsylvania, On The Adoption Of The Federal Constitution. December 4, 1787.
“…at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects… and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.”
“From the differences existing between feudal sovereignties and governments founded on compacts, it necessarily follows that their respective prerogatives must differ. Sovereignty is the right to govern; a nation or State sovereign is the person or persons in whom that resides. In Europe, the sovereignty is generally ascribed to the Prince; here, it rests with the people; there, the sovereign actually administers the government; here, never in a single instance; our Governors are the agents of the people, and, at most, stand in the same relation to their sovereign in which regents in Europe stand to their sovereigns. Their Princes have personal powers, dignities, and preeminences; our rulers have none but official; nor do they partake in the sovereignty otherwise, or in any other capacity, than as private citizens.” Chisholm v. Georgia (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @ Dall (1793) pp 471-472.
“Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.” Thomas Jefferson, Inauguration, 1801.
“It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their natural state. There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellow-men without his consent.” Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 May Term, 1796.
“But be that as it may, there is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States. It is a government of delegated powers, supreme within its prescribed sphere, but powerless outside of it. In this country, sovereignty resides in the people, and congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their constitution, entrusted to it; all else is withheld.” Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421, 1884.
Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 1886.
“The people, or sovereign are not bound by general words in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign … It is a maxim of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good and to prevent injury, the King shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and prerogative right would be divested or taken from the King (or the People) he shall not be bound.” The People v. Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348, 1825.
“No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” The constitutional theory is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 1958.
“It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.” Perry v. United States, 204 U.S. 330, 358.